The urban landscape is ever-evolving, and as cities expand, so does the need for sustainable development. In the heart of Croydon, Crossman Ecology provided expertiese in a redevelopment project that involved the demolition of two large urban houses to make way for 28 flats. One of the primary challenges faced during this endeavor was the presence of bats and reptiles on the site.
Background
The project aimed to replace two outdated urban dwellings with contemporary blocks of flats, meeting the increasing demand for housing in the area. However, the site was identified as a potential habitat for protected wildlife, specifically bats and reptiles, prompting the need for careful consideration and ecological expertise.
Key Challenges:
- Bats as Protected Species: The site was identified as a roosting area for bats, a protected species. This posed a challenge, as the demolition and construction activities could potentially disturb the roosting bats
- Reptile Presence: Ecological surveys revealed the presence of reptiles, including slowworms. The development needed to account for their habitats and potential disruption during construction.
Crossman Ecology’s Approach:
- Comprehensive Ecological Surveys: Crossman Ecology conducted thorough surveys to identify the types and numbers of bats and reptiles present on the site. This information formed the basis for developing mitigation strategies.
- Habitat Enhancement and Creation: To compensate for the loss of natural habitats, Crossman Ecology recommended the installation of bat boxes and artificial refuges for reptiles within the new development. This proactive approach aimed to encourage the relocation of wildlife to safer areas.
- Bat licencing: To ensure that the project met current legislation, Crossman Ecology ensured that all necessary licences were in place to allow the work to go ahead. To minimise disturbance to bats, the construction work was monitored during key stages of construction.
- New habitats: Crossman Ecology provided input into the design of the new gardens so that new green spaces were optimised for their benefit to wildlife and new residents.
Results
The careful implementation of the Crossman Ecology’s recommendations led to a successful resolution of wildlife concerns during the development. The mitigation strategies ensured the protection of bat roosts, the relocation of reptiles to suitable habitats, and the creation of new ecological features within the urban environment.
Conclusion
This case study exemplifies the pivotal role that ecological consultants play in navigating the delicate balance between urban development and wildlife conservation. By employing innovative mitigation strategies, the project not only met its housing objectives but also contributed to the preservation of local biodiversity.